|
Written by Chris Tom
|
|
Sunday, 26 March 2006 07:29 |
|
Think Computers thinks Windows XP 64 was dead on arrival. I think it was if you planned on printing out your homework with it. If you planned on using it as a workstation then that is a different story. Little did I know that XP64 was actually DOA, it might have been a nice idea, but I think companies just felt it was to much work to create to sets of drivers for their products, or write to different software programs for essentially the same OS. Why would companies want to do extra work when XP32 is embedded in our culture right now, and XP64 wasn't adopted by anyone but the enthusiasts or those who were curious? Those who were curious went right back to XP32 after finding all the problems that came with it, why should people try and work with an OS that really isn't supported by most manufacturers. Yes the larger companies like NVIDIA and ATI release drivers for XP64, but not often, then you have the other large companies that don't release any 64bit drivers and you are stuck with hardware that doesn't work with your freshly installed OS. |
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 6 of 20 |