| Phenom II X4 955 |
|
|
|
| Written by Jeff_Tom | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, 20 April 2009 19:43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Although they seem still quite fresh, AMD's Socket AM3 Phenom II processors have been on the market now for two and a half months and although the Phenom II X4 810 hasn't been too spectacular the Phenom II X3 720 BE has been a hit with a higher default clockspeed and an unlocked multiplier at a great price. However, at the high-end AMD still has had the Phenom II X4 940 Socket AM2+ processor at the top running at 3GHz. That is until now as AMD now has a Socket AM3 processor as their flagship platform, the AMD Phenom II X4 955.
In case you have forgotten or haven't been keeping up, AMD's AM3 processors will work fine in Socket AM2+ motherboards. AMD has been heavily pushing the lifespan of their Socket and architecture, something which Intel can't lay claim to leaving the Socket 775 market for dead and splitting up future platforms into two markets, the LGA 1366 and LGA1160 which means more motherboards to buy and less backwards compatibility.
There are actually two new processors AMD is launching today, the Phenom II X4
955 and 945, both Socket AM3 processors with 125W TDP rating with the 955
running at 3.2GHz and the 945 at 3GHz. The 955 is 200MHz higher clock than AMD's
previous best, the 940, and both run at a HyperTransport bus speed of 2GHz. The
940 ran at 1.8GHz. The chips feature 64KB of L1 cache per core, 512KB of L2, and
6MB shared L3 cache on top. As with all Phenom II's it is built on AMD's 45nm
DSL SOI process which seems to be maturing to release a 3.2GHz processor AMD also have updated AMD Overdrive with what they call Black Edition memory profiles for DDR3 memory.This will verify your RAM against an online database and adjust it for the maximum values. Pretty cool, right? Unfortunately the only Socket AM3 board we had in house wasn't quite stable with the 955 so this is another feature we'll have to look at later on. It is good to see AMD focus on the enthusiast and we recommend all owners of AMD CPUs check out Overdrive as it is great software.
Since not much is new let's move onto the technical specifications.
Here is our AMD test system.
Here is our Intel test system for Penryn.
And our Core i7 system.
Our test OS was Windows Vista 64-bit SP1. ATI Catalyst drivers were the latest from AMD at version 9.4. V-sync was disabled for all benchmarks as well as C1E and Cool 'n Quiet.
We'll start with UT3 which is the most popular graphics engine on the market and supports four cores. The Phenom 995 shows pretty much where we expect it improvement over the 940.
Crysis only supports two cores and as such the Phenom II 720 beats the Phenom II 810 in addition to the Q8200. Core i7 also sees no real boost with the Phenom II 955 basically performing exactly the same as the more expensive platform.
3DMark Vantage is dominated by the i7 but this is a synthetic score. The Phenom II also blows away the Penryn Intel quad core.
We decoded an 11 minute deleted scene from a DVD into QuickTime format for playing on iPods. The Phenom 955 gets about a good extra 20 seconds from the 940.
Valve particle benchmark tests how well processors handle rendering tons of particles on screen with multiple processors. The Phenom 955 again does about 10% better.
Valve Map creation renders a Valve map again we see similar performance from our other general performance benchmarks.
World in Conflict is a popular real-time strategy game with an intense engine. The 955 blows out the 940 here and Penryn.
Cinebench also uses all four cores and we see results that reflect that in our benchmarking.
Similar pattern in 3D rendering with Pov-RAY.
AMD has improved on their 45nm process to release 3.2GHz part at retail and it shows in our overclocking, hitting 4GHz with 1.55v. We wouldn't say this was 100% stable but 3.9GHz was much more so. For comparison, the 940 hit 3.9GHz top on high-end air.
We revised our power numbers and tested using only the onboard video of our
790GX. Idle numbers were taken 5 minutes into the Windows desktop, load stressed
all cores under Valve's map creation benchmark. The Phenom II runs much faster
yet also uses less power than the original Phenom.
Conclusion: Phenom II continues to get better and faster and the Phenom 955 and 945 are great additions to the AMD lineup. When it comes to rendering and tasks that can take advantage of Hyperthreading, AMD has a tougher time but when it comes to game and tasks for most people, AMD offers much more value in a much less expensive but robust platform full of options and tweaking for enthusiasts such as unlocked multiplier at a low entry price and AMD Overdrive software. Phenom was tough to recommend, Phenom II has none of these issues and with the 940 chip showing up at under $170 at a number of e-tailers lately that's a steal. Great job with Phenom, and we can't wait to see how the six core Opteron CPUs work out. Pricing: You can get the Phenom X4 810 for $185 and we don't see any X3 720 CPUs out yet but we're sure they'll turn up soon.
Score: 96%
|